The Charge Ledger

A sourced record of the financial-rules cases involving Manchester City: what was alleged, what was decided and by whom, and what happens next.

Record runs to . How this record is kept

Premier League v Manchester City

Open

Charges found proven in September 2026, bar Charge 4(B). City denies wrongdoing and lodged an appeal on 1 October 2026. Sanction not yet decided.

Findings of the Premier League independent Commission (Section W) on the 10 charges. Select a charge to read it. The charges cover 130 alleged breaches, counted rule by season. See how the two counts relate
    1. 1(A)Proven
    2. 1(B)Proven
    3. 1(C)Proven
    4. 1(D)Proven
    1. 2Proven
    1. 3Proven
    1. 4(A)Proven in part
    2. 4(B)Not proven
    3. 4(C)Proven
    4. 4(D)Proven
  • Proven 8
  • Proven in part 1
  • Not proven 1
City’s position

City rejects the decision and says it will appeal

City said it is innocent, called the decision legally and factually wrong, and said it will pursue the appeal routes open to it.

Recorded . See this entry in the timeline

Appeal
  • No appeal lodged 1 of 10 charges
  • Appeal pending 9 of 10 charges

Due next: Appeal Board hearing and decision

The sponsorship money

Of £949.94 million recorded as fees from Abu Dhabi sponsors over 9 seasons, the Commission found the sponsors paid £119.25 million and the club’s owner, ADUG, paid £830.69 million.

Charge 1(A)ProvenAppeal pending

City’s position City rejects the decision and says it will appeal

The figures are at paragraph 72 and footnote 8 of the decision.

Fees recorded each season and who the Commission found paid them, in £ million
SeasonShare paid by eachPaid by sponsorsPaid by ADUGRecorded
2009/104.5022.5027.00
2010/1112.7528.5041.25
2011/1216.0070.7586.75
2012/1316.00105.75121.75
2013/1416.00111.50127.50
2014/1516.00107.20123.20
2015/1616.00120.17136.17
2016/1711.00129.59140.59
2017/1811.00134.73145.73
Total119.25830.69949.94

Timeline

20 entries across 4 cases. Select a case to show it alone.

  1. Still open

    Premier League v Manchester City has not concluded. 3 steps are still to come

  2. 2026
  3. Filing

    City lodges its appeal against the Commission's decision

    City said it lodged its appeal on the evening of 1 October. The League confirmed the next day that an appeal had been lodged with the Chair of the Judicial Panel. City called the appeal comprehensive and said the decision contains errors of law, principle and fact; neither statement lists the findings it covers. A three-member Appeal Board hears the appeal in private, and the League said the outcome will be published when its rules permit.

  4. Statement
  5. Ruling

    Commission finds the charges proven, bar one

    The League published the Commission's redacted Core Decision. It found every charge proven except Charge 4(B). The Commission found that City ran a disguised funding scheme in which Abu Dhabi sponsors paid only part of their recorded fees and the club's owner paid the rest, overstating income by more than £830 million, and that the club exceeded both UEFA's and the League's spending limits once its accounts were restated. Sanction is to be decided at a separate hearing.

    City’s position City rejects the decision and says it will appeal

    Premier League v Manchester CityCopy link

  6. Report
  7. 2025
  8. Settlement

    City and the Premier League settle the APT dispute

    Both sides agreed to end the arbitration. City accepted that the current APT rules are valid and binding. The settlement did not affect the separate Commission case.

  9. Ruling

    Tribunal rules the previous APT rules unenforceable

    The tribunal decided the three unlawful aspects could not be separated from the rest, making the previous APT rules unenforceable as a whole. It made no finding on the amended rules, which the League said remained in force.

    Associated Party Transaction rules arbitrationCopy link

  10. Filing
  11. 2024
  12. Hearing
  13. Rule change
  14. Ruling

    Tribunal publishes its first award on the APT rules

    In a challenge brought by City, an arbitration tribunal found three aspects of the League's Associated Party Transaction rules unlawful, including the exclusion of shareholder loans. The League said City's wider challenge had largely failed.

  15. Hearing
  16. 2023
  17. Charge

    Premier League charges City and refers the case to an independent Commission

    The League alleged more than 100 breaches of its rules: over the club's accounts and spending across 2009/10 to 2017/18, and over cooperation with its investigation from December 2018 up to the charges. City denied every charge and said the evidence supported its position.

  18. 2020
  19. Ruling

    CAS overturns the UEFA ban

    CAS upheld City's appeal, finding some of UEFA's allegations not proven and others time-barred. It lifted the ban and set a €10 million fine for failing to cooperate with investigators.

    UEFA Financial Fair Play case and CAS appealCopy link

  20. Sanction

    UEFA bans City from European competition for two seasons

    UEFA found serious breaches of its spending rules and a failure to cooperate with investigators, and imposed a two-season ban and a €30 million fine. City called the investigation flawed and appealed to CAS.

  21. 2019
  22. Ruling

    CAS rejects City's bid to halt the UEFA case

    City had appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport in May 2019 against the decision to refer its case, before UEFA had ruled on it. CAS found the appeal inadmissible, because UEFA's own process had not finished.

    UEFA Financial Fair Play case and CAS appealCopy link

  23. Investigation

    UEFA investigator refers City for adjudication

    The chief investigator of UEFA's financial control body finished his investigation and referred the case to its adjudicatory chamber. UEFA announced the referral the next day.

    UEFA Financial Fair Play case and CAS appealCopy link

  24. Investigation

    UEFA opens a formal investigation

    UEFA opened a formal investigation into whether City had broken its financial rules. City said it welcomed the chance to end the speculation and called the accusations false.

  25. 2018
  26. Investigation
  27. Report

    Der Spiegel publishes leaked City emails

    The German outlet published internal club documents from the Football Leaks cache, alleging that money from City's owner had been presented as sponsorship income. City did not dispute that the emails were authentic, declined to comment on material it said had been hacked and stripped of context, and described the reporting as an attempt to damage its reputation.

    UEFA Financial Fair Play case and CAS appeal; Premier League v Manchester CityCopy link

  28. 2014
  29. Settlement

    City and UEFA sign a Financial Fair Play settlement

    UEFA had questioned some of City's sponsorship agreements and whether the club met its break-even requirement. No findings were made. The two sides settled, with City accepting a fine, part of it suspended, and a reduced Champions League squad for 2014/15.

    UEFA Financial Fair Play settlementCopy link

How this record is kept

Sources

Every entry links to where it comes from. A primary document is a decision, award, rule or statement published by a regulator, a tribunal, a court or the club. A press report is journalism about one. Each source is labelled as one or the other, and the charge ledger cites primary documents only. Where the Internet Archive holds a copy that shows what is cited, the source links to that archived copy as well.

Findings

This record makes no findings of its own. Where something was found, the entry says who found it and links to the document. Wherever findings against the club appear, so do the club’s response and the state of any appeal.

Charges

The ledger follows the Commission’s own numbering of the charges, not the totals used in press coverage. Names removed from a published decision stay removed here; they are not filled in from other reporting.

Dates

A date is given to the day only where a source establishes the day. Otherwise it is given to the month.

Coverage

The latest coverage list is gathered automatically from news feeds. It is not part of the record and is not checked entry by entry.

Reuse

The record may be reused with credit, under CC BY 4.0. Its files are published as JSON: the cases, the timeline, the charges, what is due, the League’s statement, the funding figures, the season table. Entries are also published as an Atom feed.

Maintainer

Rowan Flynn keeps this record as a personal project. Every change to it is logged in public: see the edit history.